| Date: 5 July 2003 | Telescope: 10 inch SCT | AVI: 1/30 sec for 300 seconds at 15 fps |
| Time: 03:20 am (GMT + 2h00) | Web cam: Logitech Quickcam Pro 4000 | Processing: Various nr. of frames selected |
| Observatory: Hartbeespoort | Magnification: 2x Meade Barlow | Software: K3CCDTools and Photoshop |
From left to right: The highest quality (in K3CCDTools) 100, 500 and 1000 frames were stacked.
Observations:
So how does this help in creating good quality stacked pictures?
Adding MANY lower quality AVI frames will NEVER result in a higher quality result. Each additionally added lower quality frame only messes up the summary results of the other frames a little bit more. Lower quality frames cannot 'generate' missing picture quality. Therefore, up to a point, the lower in quality an AVI is, the less frames you use, the better.
The best number of frames to use from a low quality AVI is zero !

| Date: 5 July 2003 | Telescope: 10 inch SCT | AVI: 1/30 sec for 30 seconds at 15 fps |
| Time: 03:30 am to 03:32 (GMT + 2h00) | Web cam: Logitech Quickcam Pro 4000 | Processing: Top 100 frames selected |
| Observatory: Hartbeespoort | Magnification: 2x Meade Barlow | Software: K3CCDTools and Photoshop |
From left to right the first 3 pictures were created from AVIs that were captured with 20, 30 and 40 percent gain respectively.
The first 3 stacked pictures clearly show that (moderately) higher gain results in getting higher quality pictures. Up until this test, I always captured AVIs with the least gain possible. I thought higher gain meant more dark frame-type noise - overwhelming the quality of a picture. I was wrong.
So from now onward I will capture my AVIs with more gain (where needed) without hesitation.
Obviously, several gain percentage comparison tests will be done during July 2003. Results will be available on this website.

| Date: 5 July 2003 | Telescope: 10 inch SCT | AVI: 1/30 sec for various seconds at various fps |
| Time: 03:50 am to 03:56 (GMT + 2h00) | Web cam: Logitech Quickcam Pro 4000 | Processing: Top 100 frames selected |
| Observatory: Hartbeespoort | Magnification: 2x Meade Barlow | Software: K3CCDTools and Photoshop |
From left to right the frame rates were: 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 frames per second.
Cleary higher frame rates result in lower quality stacked pictures.
From now on I will only capture AVIs using 5 frames per second.
While testing various webcam camera settings I might use 15 fps - to get as many different AVIs captured in the shortest possible time.