Webcam images of Mars - 18 July 2003

Mars learning curve Index


How do dust donuts affect image quality?

dust donutswebcam images of Marswebcam image of Mars

Date: 18 July 2003 Telescope: 10 inch SCT AVI: 1/10 sec at 5 fps for 100 seconds
Time: 05:09 and 05:13 (GMT + 2h00) Camera: Logitec Quickcam Pro 4000 Processing: 100 frames stacked
Observatory: Hartbeespoort Magnification: 3x Tele Vue Barlow Software: K3CCDTools and Photoshop

Mars Apparent Diameter: 19.8 " Illuminated Fraction: 0.927 Distance from Earth: 0.4737 ua Central meridian: 25.29

Dust grains on a webcam's infrared filter will cast a shadow on the ccd detector. The shape of this shadow is an out-of-focus negative image of the main mirror or lens of the telecope. This shadow also contains an 'image' of the central obstruction/secondary mirror of the telescope.

The image of Mars on the right is one raw extracted frame from the dust-infected AVI. This is what dust donuts look like ... these donuts are so ugly it does not even make me hungry!!!

While capturing the image on the left, I tried to keep the image on the worst donut-infected area of the image for a full 100 seconds.

The image in the center was captured using a relatively dust donut-free area.

The negative impact of dust donuts are obvious. So, how do I safely physically remove those dust particles ?

Unfortunately K3 CCD Tools insisted in using a cut-off-image of Mars as basis for the stacked image in the center, so it is cut of somewhat.


Mars simulation on the right: Author:T.Ikemura Japan Copyright(C)T.Ikemura Dec. 2002

Date: 18 July 2003 Telescope: 10 inch SCT AVI: 1/10 sec at 5 fps
Time: 04:49 (GMT + 2h00) Camera: Logitec Quickcam Pro 4000 Processing: 100 frames stacked
Observatory: Hartbeespoort Magnification: 3x Tele Vue Barlow Software: K3CCDTools and Photoshop

Mars Apparent Diameter: 19.8 " Illuminated Fraction: 0.927 Distance from Earth: 0.4737 ua Central meridian: 25.29


Date: 18 July 2003 Telescope: 10 inch SCT AVI: 1/10 sec at 5 fps
Time: 06:23 (GMT + 2h00) Camera: Logitec Quickcam Pro 4000 Processing: different nr. of frames stacked
Observatory: Hartbeespoort Magnification: 3x Tele Vue Barlow Software: K3CCDTools and Photoshop

Mars Apparent Diameter: 19.8 " Illuminated Fraction: 0.927 Distance from Earth: 0.4737 ua Central meridian: 42.83

I already tested several times that adding more frames does not necessarily ensure higher quality stacked images.

From left to right: 50, 100, 200 and 300 stacked images - out of 3000. 50 frames is not enough, 100 is about right, 200 and 300 frames add to many low quality frames to the result.


© Copyright 2003 - All Rights Reserved Worldwide
http://www.webcam-astrophotography.com