Quick and dirty webcam experiments - 13 June 2004

Home | Mars | Jupiter | Moon

All these pictures were taken at prime focus with a 10 inch Meade LX200 GPS telescope and a cooled Logitech Quickcam Pro 4000.

This is what I call a 'quick and dirty' webcam experiments webpage.


Experiments to determine useful range of webcam settings.

Gain
Gain controls how much the electronic signal is amplified - Jupiter images are brighter with more gain, but also more noisy.

Brightness.
Self explanatory?

Gamma
Adjusts mid-tones without affecting the brighter or lighter areas.

Saturation
More saturation means pure or strong color, less saturation means paler or weaker color. Lower saturation gives a duller/grey image.

planet Jupiter 2 not enough gamma, 1 looks better
1) 60 Brightness; 50 Gamma; 100 Saturation; 20 Gain 2) 60 Brightness; 0 Gamma; 100 Saturation; 20 Gain 3) 60 Brightness; 0 Gamma; 75 Saturation; 20 Gain
4 and 5 - 30 gain too much (overexposed), previous row of 20 gain better.

6 best of these 2 rows so far

4) 60 Brightness; 0 Gamma; 50 Saturation; 30 Gain 5) 60 Brightness; 0 Gamma; 75 Saturation; 30 Gain 6) 60 Brightness; 25 Gamma; 50 Saturation; 25 Gain
Whole row 50 brightness seems better than both previous rows at 60 brightness.

9 with 75 saturation looks best. 7 and 8 with 100 saturation seems oversaturated.

7) 50 Brightness; 0 Gamma; 100 Saturation; 30 Gain 8) 50 Brightness; 0 Gamma; 100 Saturation; 30 Gain 9) 50 Brightness; 0 Gamma; 75 Saturation; 30 Gain
12 overexposed. 10 looks great.
10) 50 Brightness; 0 Gamma; 50 Saturation; 30 Gain 11) 50 Brightness; 25 Gamma; 50 Saturation; 30 Gain 12) 55 Brightness; 10 Gamma; 75 Saturation; 30 Gain


Conclusions?

These settings are valid only for my circumstances: 10 inch SCT, prime focus Jupiter webcam astrophotography using a Logitech Quickcam Pro 4000.


© Copyright 2004 - All Rights Reserved Worldwide
http://www.webcam-astrophotography.com